Which Is Not a Way an Artist Can Unify a Composition? Art 111

Artists accept always been influenced by their surroundings, and then art often reflects its time and place. Design, which is another word for composition, has inverse with times and places since the first small sculptures and cave paintings. Of class, in the beginning those who fabricated the start fertility goddesses  and cave paintings of animals  were probably not thinking of design in the way that we do now. It seems from looking at the cavern paintings that the painters took advantage of the natural concavities and convexities of the cave walls, to draw their bison and other brute forms. Design too often follows function - so, the cave paintings probably were done a sure way to suit the makers' purposes, whether spiritual or hunting, or both.

One of the first major civilizations to codify blueprint elements was the Egyptian. Their wall paintings  were done in the service of the Pharoahs, and followed a rigid code of signs, visual rules and meanings to that end. Art fabricated prior to what nosotros consider the beginning of western civilization has usually been called "primitive," meaning that the artists were not artistically trained in a formal sense until perchance two centuries prior to the birth of Christ. Even now, artists who have non received specialized artistic preparation are referred to equally primitive, or self-taught, like Grandma Moses. Up until the Greek culture began, "art" served other purposes than aesthetic, i.e., religious or hunting. Art has served other masters up until our time, too, in the service of the churches from the Middle Ages through the Renaissance; and of various political powers fifty-fifty well into the 20th century. This 'primitive' (an unfortunate term) art possesses sure mutual characteristics, such as the absence of linear perspective, which results in a flat space, whether in the work of Grandma Moses or in Western farsi miniatures of the 16th century. Linear perspective was developed before and during the Renaissance, so before the Renaissance, and afterwards in many individuals and societies, there was no endeavor to create the illusion of depth in paintings. These artists tend to create images based on what they know, similar children usually do, and non every bit much on what they see. Objects generally do not decrease in size as they are farther away; there is piddling overlapping of forms to point position in infinite; to bespeak further locations in space, forms are ofttimes placed vertically on top of ane some other. At that place is no foreshortening of figures, for example, in Egyptian friezes; all of the figures are seen in profile - even the anxiety of a figure facing front are seen from the side, contrary to anatomy. At that place is little shading to indicate iii dimensions; the composition is based on a apartment pattern, or other 2-dimensional blueprint. Images were not drawn from life - but rather from retentiveness or preconceived methods of amalgam an paradigm. The purpose is to tell a "story," or promote a political or religious betoken of view, frequently, rather than involve purely artful considerations, or, to decorate a functional object, every bit in crafts.

Oriental art as well has a tradition of a apartment surface, without the utilize of linear perspective, such every bit Chinese and Japanese painting , which is based more than on non-naturalistic premises, such as contemplation and internal realities, rather than external appearances. Partly from the influence of Japanese fine art in the 19th century, western art since about 1890 has returned to the primacy of the apartment surface in painting, though often in variations of flatness, getting away from linear perspective and the illusion of depth. The monolithic monuments of ancient times, from Stonehenge to Easter Isle heads , were probably congenital for other concerns than artistic - again, perhaps spiritual (related to ancestors) purposes. They accept a power, mystery and a timeless quality which influence many artists of our time, who possibly long for an expression of eternity, rather than getting caught upwards in the overwhelming temporal reality. Robert Smithson created artworks from arrangements of large natural elements, similar rocks and bodies of water, into spiral and other primal forms, in the 1960's and '70'south. This type of art is called earth fine art; the works themselves are called globe works.

The Greeks were the next major culture afterwards the Egyptians, who became concerned with anatomical accuracy in their sculpture , as well as the presentation of the ideal. At this time, wall paintings became more than concerned with painterly values, and less with ideological constraints, and began to represent three dimensions in figures, though often in a decorative manner. (Decorative is a term which connotes a flat space, and by and large is used as a criticism in fine art, when the image is too similar to, say, wallpaper - too concerned with prettiness, also regular, also shallow physically and emotionally, etc., and ameliorate suited for interior decorating or arts and crafts, where the primary concern is unremarkably harmony, rather than the more substantive demands of fine art.) The Greek aesthetic dealt with order, reason, harmony, and the ideal, and these virtues developed into the forms of their sculpture, which is sheer perfection, based on the forms of nature. Roman art was based on much of Greek fine art, and continued a similar tradition, with Roman painting more concerned with representations of figures from life - more three-dimensional, more individual, and with more emphasis on modeling in the figures (shading of lights and darks), and the beginning of landscape and still life painting, with more than depiction of book and space.

An idea perchance originating with the Greeks was the Gilded Section  (or Ratio). This was an aesthetic and mathematical idea concerning divine proportion, the golden rectangle, and gilded proportion. A rectangle was said to be most pleasing to the eye when it possessed a certain ratio of width to height: the mathematical ratio of 0.618:1. Examples of Greek architecture are thought to have contained this 'divine' ratio, as well equally their conception of anatomical relationships, for instance, from the superlative of hair to optics, and from the eyes to the chin of the 'perfect' face. The thought of the gilded department connected into the Renaissance, where Italian thinkers expanded the idea. I am hardly a mathematician, but basically, you have a line, A to B; and line AB is divided at point C, then that the ratio of the two parts of AB, the smaller to the larger, is the same as the ratio of the larger part (CB) to the whole, AB. And this relationship is mathematically expressed as 0.618:i. This system was also used by some artists as a mode to compose their paintings in a more than aesthetically pleasing manner. Artists since who made utilize of this 'divine' proportion include da Vinci, Durer, Seurat, Vermeer and Mondrian, equally a manner of dividing the sheet into compositional segments most pleasing to the heart.

In the Heart Ages, Celtic art contained a combination of abstract and organic elements - with the 'brute' mode and interlacing bands, at get-go symmetrical, and used often in metalwork. It and then spread to wood, stone and manuscript illumination. After the autumn of Rome, Ireland's monasteries produced manuscripts to spread the word of God, which contained this elaborate embellishment, for example in the Book of Kells . At that place were strict rules of design - symmetry, connections of lines and images, color repetitions (they eschewed representational images, in preference to ornamental ones), and curvilinear motility. Book covers in Romanesque design were decorative and organic, also in the service of religion or politics.

The first real design in art came in Italy at the stop of the 13th century, in the painting of Giotto  and others. There are hints of three dimensions in the figures, and in space, and in the architectural framework, and the beginnings of perspective. At that place was a new kind of pictorial space - and new pictorial unity, organized rather than casual. There were strong, simple forms, group of figures, shallow space, arranged with an inner coherence. Each composition was attuned to the emotional content of the piece of work (the structure conveys meaning, equally well every bit the subject matter). Perspective lines directly our eyes toward a focal point in the distance, and the surface of the painting becomes a window through which we perceive "real" space. There is also more realism, scenes of daily life, and a more secular approach. In around 1400, deep atmospheric space appeared in painting, although not in a formal sense.

In the Renaissance , the emphasis was humanistic, rather than divine - human, non God. The Flemish  in the Due north had an interest in realism (false of nature), and the symbolism of everyday objects (the physical globe is a mirror of divine truths). This was also the beginning of the use of oil pigment, then there was a more subtle colour range than in previous mediums. Atmospheric perspective appeared - this ways that there is less contrast and saturation of the colors in the infinite furthest away from the painting surface (depth), which also gives the piece of work a certain unity. The artist in Italia was no longer perceived as merely a craftsman. Linear perspective was invented at this time, also - lines receding in infinite toward a vanishing point on the horizon line, at the viewer's eye level. Science came to the aid of artists, every bit more than importance was placed on objective accuracy of images. There was an involvement in the nude figure, and its anatomical accuracy; using chiaroscuro (light and dark shading) to indicate volume in forms, and as a unifying element in the limerick (eliminating the barriers of contour lines between forms). Colour harmonies began to be studied, and artists began doing preliminary studies for composing artworks. They also began to use geometric forms to compose and stabilize compositions, such as the triangle.

The painter Titian  began to go out private brushstrokes visible on the painting surface, in an unfinished fashion, allowing marks to become compositional elements. In the Mannerist style, fine art became more emotional, as a reaction against the precision of the Renaissance, with exaggerated forms and perspective, as with El Greco . Bizarre painting brought the beginning of gestural limerick, where there is a sweeping compositional motion in the piece of work, curvilinear in aspect. Rembrandt  and others began to do studies of color and light for paintings in this manner, rather than drawing the forms and filling them in. This causes a "painterly" style, as opposed to a linear fashion, which means that in that location is intermovement and interconnection of the forms, by means of shared color and tone, and easier move between forms in the composition, with shape, rather than line. This brought a unified vision to the painting. Rembrandt too used other paintings for compositional ideas. As Rembrandt did with dark tones, Vermeer  did with calorie-free, likewise every bit rhythms and proportions, creating an overall unity in his paintings. Velazquez , also a painter in the Baroque manner, besides used light to create a visible world, and his work was influential to Manet and the Impressionists.

Following the Bizarre and the Rococo, a Neo-Classical fashion set in, with a render to the society, logic, and harmony of classical Greece and Rome, as well every bit classical discipline thing, with painters such as Poussin  in France. Geometric structure was emphasized, equally well as repeated motifs, such as a triangular arrangement of forms, and secondary motifs within the larger ones. Chardin'due south still lifes  contained this conscientious arrangement of forms, curves and lines. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the academies  developed in Europe, presenting their ideas, rules and procedures for proper painting, working in the studio from plaster casts, and somewhen human models. This somewhen led to a sterile, pre-packaged style of painting, and was the order against which the Impressionists  rebelled in the mid-19th century. Landscapists, such as Claude Lorraine, did loose sketches from nature, which they brought into the studio to be refined in a major style; the Impressionists subsequently did these sketches from life, also - notwithstanding, they chose to permit the "sketch" stand as the finished work. In the early 1800'due south, the English painter Constable besides did many loose landscape studies from life, which influenced the Impressionists, also. Turner , also an English painter, did many loosely painted works, in a romantic, painterly, "formless" manner, almost to the point of abstraction, with the apply of COLOR, equally opposed to tone (light and dark) - again, an influence on the Impressionists.

These influences acquired Manet  to pigment with piffling modeling and blending of the brushstrokes - the painting is no longer a window onto the globe, merely a flat surface which has its own reality of pure painting - brushstrokes, color, composition, etc. He then also influenced the young Impressionists Monet  and Renoir, and others, to paint not g history or classical works in the studio, only to work from life, in the plein air, with dissever touches of color left as such, and not blended smoothly, and to paint modern life, non centuries agone. They likewise were interested in current theories of color, how colors reacted to one some other on the canvas; and were influenced past the new invention of the camera, with its casual images where the forms were oft cutting off at the edge of the painting (look at many of Degas' works ), and besides by the influx of Japanese prints,  with their flatness and lack of depth. Composition for Manet was still somewhat premeditated, but for Monet and Renoir, composition was decided on the spot, in a more casual, intuitive manner than at the academies, with no "preliminary studies," and less use of the traditional foreground/centre ground/background and then essential to conventional painting. The "unfinished sketch" now became the last art product, not the preliminary one, and the painting is considered to have its own pictorial reality contained of external reality, in an abstract sense. Thus, Whistler calls his 'Whistler'southward Mother' painting, Arrangement in Grey and Black . Rodin , in sculpture, besides leaves parts of his forms "unfinished," and this unfinished quality becomes an expressive statement and artful principle, fragmentary and poetic, leaving the viewer to finish the paradigm in his or her heed.

So, along came Cezanne , with the Impressionists. He came under Pissarro's tutelage and painted from life with the Impressionists, then gradually went his own way. He merged the 'formlessness' of Impressionism with the geometric structuring of the classical painters, creating a new kind of space, which is a combination of Renaissance space with its linear perspective and the illusion of distance, and the modern, flat infinite. This combining of the two kinds of space causes a smashing tension and ability in his piece of work, which is as well released due to the great harmony his works also incorporate; and also is the crusade of his distortions of objects and perspective. He abandoned traditional modeling of forms and blending of brushstrokes - fifty-fifty his shadows are positive forms. He disregarded the logic of external appearance, for the inner logic of design. Every brushstroke is a building block in the structure of the forms and of the painting, and has a rhythmic pattern which contributes to the pictorial perfection. His works are cracking examples of disciplined energy. Erle Loran studied Cezanne'south compositions, and wrote a book chosen Cezanne's Compositions , in which he analyzed the paintings structurally and compositionally. Another Postal service-Impressionist, Seurat , used small, precise dots of color and vertical and horizontal design elements, arranged according to mathematical principles and scientific color theories. Van Gogh  expanded the dot to the personal handwriting of the 'mark,' and used color in an emotional, as well every bit visual, style. Gauguin painted in a flat, pre-Renaissance way, with colors contained of their identity in 'real' life, in a Symbolist manner. The painter Maurice Denis declared that painting is non nigh the discipline, only rather is a flat surface that is covered with colors in a particular order (well-nigh the final decade of the 19th century). Hither, the inner vision of the artist is more of import than the "correct" ascertainment of nature, in a more 'innocent' expression than that of 'civilized' man.

The 20th century, with its myriad of ism'due south and new ideas, arrived, from Matisse, with his Fauvist  riotous colour and sweeping, costless compositional movement to an expressive cease; to Picasso, with his continuation of Cezanne's ideas into the pictorial structure of Cubism . In 1910, brainchild made its first appearance, in the work of Kandinsky , among others. Abstraction is considered to be modified shapes of visible reality; whereas non-objective ways that there is no resemblance to physical reality, nor is there a possibly literary reference anywhere in the work - it is its ain reality. Mondrian took the use of geometric design to the limit, where previously pattern was based as much on nature. Early 20th century serious formal experimentation and study of pattern principles was done by such groups equally the Constructivists, de Stijl, Suprematists, the Bauhaus, and a number of others, including Moholy-Nagy, who wrote a book on design, Vision in Motion , and Josef Albers, who spent a lifetime studying the interaction of colors. The collage was invented, in which newspapers and other actual objects, such equally chair caning, were pasted onto the sheet. There is no more illusionistic space, modelling, foreshortening - just overlapping of real objects on the surface - creating a new, completely flat infinite. Futurism  introduced the idea of physical movement into painting, and thus, the chemical element of time, and the idea of the machine, with its modern connotations (Einstein'south and Freud'southward ideas had simply arrived). The subject of the work of art becomes the visual elements it contains, and their formal organisation. Fantasy besides becomes an element, in the work of Chagall , Klee and de Chirico. And the Dadaists arrived, with Duchamp and others (Duchamp can be considered the kickoff 'conceptual' artist - where the idea of the work of art is more than pregnant than the actual art object.) Dada  was a form of protest of the Outset World War, and its resultant disillusionment. All artful and moral values were rendered meaningless; and then the Dadaists set out to turn sacred artistic values on their ears. They created 'anti-fine art,' which was based on the unconscious and the laws of chance. In the 1917 Society of Independent Artists exhibition in New York, Duchamp exhibited a "readymade" or 'establish' object - a urinal - under the pseudonym of "R Mutt." He and others were questioning the very nature of art - what is fine art? What is not fine art? Is it art because the artist says it is, or does it become art when it is placed in a museum? Of a sudden the "rules" were thrown out the window for the Dadaist anarchy. Also during the 20th century, the notion of an "artless" art came into mode - innocent, assuming, gratis, free of rules and preconceptions - not unlike what children produce naturally, every bit peradventure being more "genuine," or honest.

Surrealism  was based on the ideas put along by Dada, and continued these ideas further in the 1920's and 1930'due south, basing the work not on reason or moral purpose, but according to the laws of gamble, dreams, and the unconscious. The most famous Surrealist was Salvador Dali, who painted 'unreality' in a nearly realistic manner. There were likewise artists loosely connected with Surrealism, whose work does not physically resemble that of Dali, such as Joan Miro , whose piece of work is biomorphic in nature, and who did not consider himself to exist an abstractionist, though his work is so removed from its sources that it appears to be so. Surrealism likewise influenced the Abstract Expressionists in the 1940'due south in America. Figures such as Max Ernst and Arshile Gorky  influenced many American and European exiled painters before and later on World War Two, with their conceptual and gestural ideas virtually painting. Gestural limerick is composition based not on geometric forms, just rather on a generally organic "gesture" or sweeping motion across the canvas, generally abstract or partially abstract in nature. The Abstruse Expressionists, or action painters, such as Jackson Pollock and Willem de Kooning, are examples of this style of painting, which became the dominant force in art in the 1950's in America and around the world. Painting was thought to exist based on a more than spiritual source, and the painters in this school all did piece of work which was dissimilar, and widely ranging, from the geometric abstraction of Barnett Newman to the poetic color field painting of Marking Rothko . Pollock himself invented a new way of working, historically important in method and concept. He used the brush in a new way - dripping and pouring paint in swirls and drips around the canvas, which he placed on the floor. The resultant space of this multi-layered imaging was unlike whatsoever infinite seen so far; it reminds me of outer space - infinite infinite, which we meet every bit a limitless but flat surface. This type of composition came to be called "all-over" - which ways that every part of the canvass is equal to every other, and all are on the same plane in infinite. This is in dissimilarity to traditional composition, which dictated that there exist a focal signal in the painting, one expanse that was the more than important. There also came to be a distinction between subject affair, and content. Subject matter is the bodily subject of a work, whereas content is what the piece of work is virtually. For instance: In the novel Moby Dick , the subject thing is a human and a whale; the content is the symbolic meaning of the piece of work, which may bargain with homo's fate in the universe, and many other ideas and levels. A more recent example of this would exist Ken Kesey's Ane Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest,  which is ostensibly well-nigh patients in a mental hospital; but the content, or significant, of the work, lies in contemporary man's relationship to guild, and other ideas.

Since Jackson Pollock, artists have made images with ways other than the traditional castor, many of which represent a new source, which I call 'industrial nature.' As the natural world in our environment is dwindling, artists, every bit always, are influenced by their surroundings. The personal handwriting of the brush, and the marking, often requite fashion to a less personal signature, that of 'inorganic' nature. Paint is dripped, poured, stained, without brushstrokes, from the contemplative, soft fields of Rothko'southward piece of work, to the stains of Helen Frankenthaler , to Pollock's drips. The procedure of monoprinting brings out the significance of the accidental. Much of this and more gimmicky art reminds me of a manmade nature - with industrial origins - like rust, accidental stains, nifty and peeling paint, plaster and stone, etc. Images which are made in printmaking processes by the use of various tools, brainstorm to testify up in painting as well. These new methods are natural, in their own way - images are made somewhat by risk - by the way the liquid pigment naturally flows across the sheet; rust is a natural procedure; cracking and peeling are "natural" processes. In stained canvas painting, the paint is floated on, like the aurora borealis; the interference of a hand or brush would modify this image, take abroad from its catholic sense of timelessness. These are nature's processes and advent, too: the shapes of clouds, h2o flowing, vegetation's growth, patterns of stars, the structures of the atom and biological prison cell. How the prototype gets to the canvass doesn't matter - brush,finger, spill, stencil - the prototype itself is what matters. In this context, Rauschenberg  and Jasper Johns' methods of collaging images becomes more pertinent to contemporary life, with its patchwork rhythms. At that place is geometry, but the piece of work is also romantic/playful, and at that place are the modern notions of accident and lyricism. There is now a blending of romantic and classical, non like the opposition of these two forces in 19th century French painting.

In Pop art, the raw material of art is the new consumer environment - advertizing, mass-production, billboards, comic books. And the forms and compositions are also borrowed from these sources: Lichtenstein'southward dot comic book paintings; Warhol's repeated soup cans; Rosenquist's billboard-influenced paintings ; Jasper Johns' bronze beer cans.

Installation art arrived - George Segal  with his plaster figures in gimmicky vignette environments; Kienholz, with his black installations with metaphors of death. Art's time-honored tradition of using everyday objects to brand universal art is seen in the work of Rauschenberg'southward assemblages, with onetime car tires, blimp goat, etc., making poetry of the mundane, and social/psychological commentary of modern life. Installation art became larger, filling upward large rooms with diaphanous material, like Judy Pfaff's installations, which offer a new identity for sculpture.

Op art gained prominence post-obit Pop - the concern for purely optical processes. Vasarely  was the major figure of this minor movement, with his centre-popping works of optical illusion. Josef Albers is sometimes classed in this category, however, his aims went beyond the merely optical. He spent a lifetime studying colors and their infinite interactions in painting, using the foursquare as his merely grade. Minimalism, begun in the late 1960's, likewise limited its visual structures, but also by and large express its colour, with the exception of Agnes Martin , whose muted-color geometric abstractions are also concerned with subtle color changes. By minimizing the visual activity in a painting, the Minimalists force the viewer to notice every single nuance of line, form or colour - which is what artists try to exercise generally - make the viewer stop and notice.

Conceptualism , as well begun in the 1960'southward (Duchamp can, still, be considered its kickoff proponent, in the beginning of the 20th century) is concerned with the idea of a work of art being more than of import than the execution of the work, i.e., idea over product. This movement has produced an infinite number of variations of this idea - each artist and each piece of work of art presents a new visual class and idea, rather than a stylistic similarity. Sometimes in that location is no visual production involved - maybe but photographs taken of the fine art as information technology was enacted. To a lesser extent, this as well contains the idea that art in our contemporary globe has become a "commodity" like any other - to be bought, traded, measured in financial value. If the artwork is only an idea without physical grade, it defies commodification. In this sense, there is no "design," or "composition," or sometimes fifty-fifty any visual component to conceptual art.

Finally, there is environmental, or earth art, likewise begun in the tardily '60's. Christo and Jeanne-Claude , and Robert Smithson are mayhap its best known artists. Art is made out of natural elements, oftentimes very large, like bodies of h2o and islands, of natural and manmade materials. Christo and Jeanne-Claude too sometimes "wrap" buildings and islands, or construct a trail of big umbrellas, or very loftier and lengthy material curtains in a mural, for temporary artworks. It is a very interesting process, for they begin by contacting and dealing with the inhabitants of that landscape, usually resulting in public hearings where the pros and cons of the proposed artwork are discussed, sometimes hotly. Christo and Jeanne-Claude have a team of workers who construct these projects; and often, afterward they have presented their proposal and vision to the inhabitants, they as well go enthusiastic, after their initial reluctance. Information technology is a study in relations between creative person and gild, and is also a testament to the desire of much contemporary art to attain out and interact with their club, rather than be the older vision of the artist as the solitary, out of touch reclusive. This want for interaction with the public is an endeavour of artists to include society in the art-making procedure itself - a collaboration, which is likewise a characteristic of much conceptual art. Contemporary social club has marginalized the artist; painting and sculpture have taken a backseat to the main art form, film. I think artists have responded to this by trying to upgrade their human activity into an interactive, upwards-to-the-minute offering - perhaps to survive.

Modernism, considered to be from around 1905 to the 1950'due south, was concerned with explorations of design and formal elements in painting, such every bit composition, infinite, and color. This acquired many new forms and structures in fine art, "pushing the envelope" of formal invention, and often was characterized by a stringent adherence to concepts and formal blueprint experimentation, with a concurrent sober and heroic stance. With the advent of Pop art, this aristocratic attitude lightened up somewhat, ushering in the Post-Modern era, with its connotations of relaxed formal concerns. In college design courses, sometimes the curriculum is a rigorous and systematic study of pattern principles, with many projects to behave out these principles. My experience has been that in an fine art schoolhouse, there is a more than intuitive approach to pattern educational activity, whereas peradventure in a academy setting, at that place is a tendency toward the more 'academic' approach. Since I attended an art school, my arroyo is a more intuitive one. I think that now, in a lot of ways, "anything goes" in terms of artists' intentions and execution of artworks. Of course, in that location always existed the artistic trend to stretch and experiment in bold fashion, simply I call back that now the sensation of space possibility of grade, and the multiplicity of cultural approaches has widened creative output, into a global, open-ended array of artistic visions. In that location are equally many artistic visions as there are human being beings - a good for you, promising situation, I experience.

An example of the looser,  Impressionistic composition, with more flattened space, of the middle and late 19th century, is a painting by Pierre- Auguste Renoir .

Run across the "all-over" flat composition and infinite space of Jackson Pollock's work  of the 1940's and early on 1950'south.

Encounter an case of earth art, past Robert Smithson ,  of the tardily 1960's and early on 70'south.

With this notion of painting as apartment, came the idea that a painting is no longer a window looking out into illusionary spatial depth (as in the Renaissance), simply only a apartment surface. The notion of effigy versus ground  also came to be questioned. Previously, there was the "effigy," or object, in the painting, which is now chosen the 'positive' space; and the space effectually the figure or object, before known every bit the background (or ground), at present known as the 'negative' space. What previously was known as the figure/footing relationship, gradually came to be the positive infinite/negative space relationship. My college blueprint professor said information technology simply, "In that location is no such thing as groundwork." What that means is that every part of the sail is equal in terms of importance, and in terms of space, in mod painting. Every part of the painting has to be taken into account - the negative shapes must be considered as much as the positive shapes, and they must work together to form a unified whole. I'm not sure exactly when this shift took place, probably from the cease of the 19th to the centre of the 20th centuries. With this idea, the traditional custom of having a focal point, or almost prominent and defined area, in a painting was gradually abandoned, in favor of the entire surface. And figure/ground, positive/negative duality also adult into an integrated pictorial surface where you can't separate effigy/ground, positive/negative - they are all one interwoven pictorial unit. Another evolution that took place somewhat simultaneously was the modern chief use of color to organize a painting, rather than the more than traditional utilize of tonal relationships (lights and darks). When painting with color being more important than tonal values, if there is a very nighttime spot in the painting, it will appear every bit a "hole" in the otherwise more flat composition; that's one reason the Impressionists didn't use nighttime colors/tones such as black. Yet another change in the works was that painters were now letting the underlying structure/design of a painting bear witness in the finished work, rather than camouflaging it under the subject matter by careful, shine blending of the brushstrokes.

An example of Renaissance limerick, where the illusion of depth is created through the use of perspective, is a painting past the artist Canaletto .

petersontial1966.blogspot.com

Source: http://www.ndoylefineart.com/design2.html

Share this post